<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Convergence of Online and Offline Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking</link>
	<description>WebSite Marketing Consultants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeux ps2</title>
		<link>http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking/comment-page-1#comment-316174</link>
		<dc:creator>jeux ps2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking#comment-316174</guid>
		<description>I agree with your post. Online and offline marketing are related to each other, however believe, an online marketer can do offline marketing but an offline marketer cannot do online marketing since offline marketers are not aware of new media tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your post. Online and offline marketing are related to each other, however believe, an online marketer can do offline marketing but an offline marketer cannot do online marketing since offline marketers are not aware of new media tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking/comment-page-1#comment-247022</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking#comment-247022</guid>
		<description>Online networking is just an extension of offline networking but I am very much convinced that the deep connection you share in offline can never be matched by the online connection!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online networking is just an extension of offline networking but I am very much convinced that the deep connection you share in offline can never be matched by the online connection!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking/comment-page-1#comment-122760</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking#comment-122760</guid>
		<description>Nate,

Just from my own observation, I have had online relationships with many people over the years, and meeting in-person just deepened the relationship.  These were initiated by everything from forum memberships to comments on other people&#039;s blogs.

Meeting many people in-person and then taking it to Facebook or LinkedIn helps to facilitate an ongoing relationship, but it still boils down to personalities and &quot;hitting it off&quot;.  I don&#039;t find these bonds to be as strong - mainly because there isn&#039;t an established relationship at the start.  While many initial meetings go into the Facebook files, some continue by email and phone and flourish from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate,</p>
<p>Just from my own observation, I have had online relationships with many people over the years, and meeting in-person just deepened the relationship.  These were initiated by everything from forum memberships to comments on other people&#8217;s blogs.</p>
<p>Meeting many people in-person and then taking it to Facebook or LinkedIn helps to facilitate an ongoing relationship, but it still boils down to personalities and &#8220;hitting it off&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t find these bonds to be as strong &#8211; mainly because there isn&#8217;t an established relationship at the start.  While many initial meetings go into the Facebook files, some continue by email and phone and flourish from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking/comment-page-1#comment-122748</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitelogicmarketing.com/blog/02-online-social-networking#comment-122748</guid>
		<description>Online vs off-line networking is an interesting discussion.  You are right on in that placing focus on building the relationship first is the best approach.

I&#039;m not an expert, but I&#039;ve noticed two different approaches to this:

1.  Individuals meet off-line and then transfer that relationship to web-based networks (such as the case with Facebook, LinkedIn, and other permission based data sharing platforms)

2.  Individuals meet friends of friends via online social networks, blogs, forums, etc., and then translate that to face to face social groups.

In your opinion, which scenario has tendency to build stronger relationships?  OR do you think it matters at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online vs off-line networking is an interesting discussion.  You are right on in that placing focus on building the relationship first is the best approach.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an expert, but I&#8217;ve noticed two different approaches to this:</p>
<p>1.  Individuals meet off-line and then transfer that relationship to web-based networks (such as the case with Facebook, LinkedIn, and other permission based data sharing platforms)</p>
<p>2.  Individuals meet friends of friends via online social networks, blogs, forums, etc., and then translate that to face to face social groups.</p>
<p>In your opinion, which scenario has tendency to build stronger relationships?  OR do you think it matters at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
